Rachel wall, the last female hanged in Massachusetts
The Last Woman Hanged in Massachusetts Was Not Convicted of Witchcraft! Rachel (Schmidt) Wall 1760-October 8, 1789
The Witch Trials had tainted Massachusetts history and legal decisions since 1692. The city of Salem hanged fifteen women, allowing four others to die in prison. Lest we forget, they also hanged five men associated with witchcraft. Out of disdain for this practice, as much for the treatment of women, and other financial inequities, The King of England, William III, revoked the Massachusetts Bay Colony Charter to end Puritan religious abuses.
Boston was now free to establish common law based on court judgments and jury opinions. To this time, the law permitted a woman that delivered a baby outside wedlock to be hanged. The responsible male partner was exempt or nullified by his jury of peers. Only men sat on juries. As Common Law evolved hangings for witchcraft ended but a select number of women were still hanged between 1691 and 1735, for adultery or childbirth outside of marriage or other felonies. Unfortunately, it took the Common Law years to address all legal prejudices towards women.
In more than 200 years, 127 women were hanged in New England. Rachel Wall was the last woman hanged in Massachusetts on October 8, 1789. If we can be politically correct, she was alleged to be a pirate but was judged to be a thief, committing several physical assaults. Yet, her background provides no link to her vices.
Rachel was born in Carlisle Pennsylvania in 1760. At trial, she stated her father was a farmer, and she was raised Presbyterian. Hearsay suggested her maiden name was Schmidt. She said at trial that her parents gave her a good education. This would imply they provided a good home, schooling, and religion.[i] She married George Wall, and they moved to New York and then Boston. Her husband joined the American Revolutionary Army leaving her to support herself. On his return, the company they kept led to her eventual demise.[ii]
In her words to the court, provided by Daniel Williams in his book Pillars of Salt:
"I acknowledge myself to have been guilty of a great many crimes, such as Sabbath-breaking, stealing, lying, disobedience to parents, and almost every other sin a person could commit, except murder . . . .
In short, the many small crimes I have committed, are too numerous to mention . . . And therefore a particular narrative of them here would serve to extend a work of this kind to too great a length . . . .”
It appears to most historians that George, her husband, was a licensed privateer during the American Revolution, but neither the English nor the American governments offered licenses after the war ended in 1783. George now applied his experience to making a living. Any commercial vessel was a target of his crimes on the ocean. Rachel in tattered clothing may have been the bait to lore vessels to her aide as she waved in distress from George’s schooner. Below decks, the pirates waited to board the unsuspecting and ill-prepared commercial ship. Author, Cindy Vallor, described the manner of deception;
“If the would-be rescue vessel had a small crew that the pirates could easily subdue, they waited until the two ships were tied together, then they boarded the merchant ship and killed her captain and crew. If the rescuers outnumbered George and his mates, Wall refused the offer of passage aboard the merchant vessel and invited her master and first mate to come aboard, supposedly to offer what assistance they could to make repairs. Once the men went below to survey the schooner’s damage, they were murdered. Then George and the men either slipped aboard the rescue ship and slaughtered the remaining crewmembers, or invented a plausible excuse for more sailors from the merchant crew to come aboard the schooner. In turn, these men also met their doom. Once all the merchant crew was dead, George and his friends weighted down the bodies then heaved them over the side. After they plundered the merchantman of any cargo and personal items of value, they scuttled her so that both crew and vessel were never seen again. George deduced, and rightly so that people ashore would assume the ship went down during the storm.” [iii]
Though no reference was cited, Cindy Vallor suggested a couple of dozen men between 1783 and 1788, were murdered by George and his crew. George never made it to trial. A hurricane caught his schooner off shore, and he was swept overboard and drowned.
Rachel survived another four years. She was adept at stealing valuables on ships docked at numerous Boston wharfs, typically in the middle of the night.[iv] As ships’ captains learned to secure their valuables, she turned to random assaults on unaccompanied women. Twice she was lashed, fined and indentured to the highest bidder. View the newspaper clipping below. This did not stop her crime spree. In the end, she was arrested in the act a third time and sent to trial where she received the death sentence. She proclaimed her innocence. Here is the account of the last robbery from the Massachusetts Sentinel newspaper.
A singular kind of robbery, for this part of the world, took place on Friday evening last : As a woman was walking alone, she was met by another woman, who seized hold of her and stopped her mouth with her handkerchief, and tore from her head her bonnet and cushion, after which she flung her down, took her shoes and buckles, and then fled. She was soon overtaken and committed to jail [v] Rachel’s attorneys pleaded for a lesser charge on the claim that Rachel’s victim actually maintained possession of her bonnet, used by Rachel to drag the victim to the ground. The hat was valued at seven shillings equal to slightly more than one-third of an English pound. While British currency was deflating in 1789, the value of the hat was hardly the full story.
The Hurricane that consumed her husband and ended her career as a pirate led to an ocean of resentment; or shall we say retribution? Rachel’s trial attracted a notable crowd. The prosecuting attorney was Robert Treate Paine, a signer of the Declaration of Independence. He asked for the death sentence for “a hardened criminal twice before convicted of “feloniously stealing.” A chief witness was Colonel Thomas Dawes, a Revolutionary hero, architect, a neighbor of John Adams, cousin to William Dawes[vi] and good friend of John Hancock. Though there were five presiding judges, John Hancock, Governor of Massachusetts signed the death sentence. It is easy to speculate that her crimes on the ocean fueled the ultimate judgement for the felonies committed on land. Specifics of the trial can be found at the Superior Court records in the Massachusetts State Archives, microfilm.
Rachel was hanged with two other criminals on October 10, 1789, in the Boston Common. All three criminals were found guilty of highway robbery, according to the Massachusetts Sentinel (Centinel).
P.S. Cindy Vallor makes some interesting suggestions. Rachel did not confess to piracy even on the gallows, according to the local newspapers of the day. At trial, Rachel testified that her husband had left her, suggesting she had no indication of his drowning. Other sources indicated that she did admit at trial to her piracy and did survive the hurricane along with other crew members.
Our perspective is, if her husband and entire crew died at sea in a hurricane, Rachel should have suffered the same fate if she was pirating that day. Was she a part time pirate or lucky to have missed this voyage? Or none of the above?
I just wanted to tell you and Mitch how very much I enjoyed today. Mitch is passion for history comes through loud and clear in his delivery.
I learned new facts about Paul Revere that I had never known before.
Mitch was so well-prepared including all of the pictures and it was obvious that heput a lot of time and effort into this tour and the presentation.
So thank you so much for the invitation He did a great job! leslie b, Natick
10/18/2017Hi Mitch, finally getting to say thank you for such an enjoyable day and tour of Paul Revere etc.. I truly learned so much and loved walking through so much of historic Boston! PHYLIS, nh
9/5/2017 Hi Beth, Thanks for asking us to go on your tour, Mitch, of Boston’s historic sites. Your enthusiasm and love of history is contagious. You made history come alive. Sorry I had to leave early. I bet the tour of the North End was equally exciting! You put your all into it. sarah r. Wellesley
6/15/2017 firstname.lastname@example.org Comment 6/1/2017, Your remarks about John Hancock really painted a historical image of the man. 6/1/2016 Hi Mitch, resume services reviews has just posted a comment on your blog post, Why Did Paul Revere Become a Coroner at the Age of Sixty-two? : This is a very interesting piece of historical information. I was never aware of this information before. I didn't even know how relevant Paul Revere is in the history of Boston. It seems that he is a very important figure on Boston's foundation. I'm definitely going to dwell further into matter and research more about him.Comment actions:
6/3/2017 GS, SNHU,edu, Mitch your remarks about John Hancock really painted an historical image of the man.
10/15/2016 Thank you so much for the Boston Massacre Tour. I never knew it was such a complicated affair. I particularly liked the incidental historical stops about Colonial Boston. I hadn't been downtown for years. You opened up so much for me. June, Natick Ma.
An association of tour guifrd for educators, amateurs historians, and the general public looking to walk beyond the Freedom Trail, concentrating on the legal, philosophical, emotional and political events of Boston.